In a standard depiction, which pursues from general relativity and our best galactic perceptions, the Universe must be completely portrayed as a four-dimensional item, with time assuming the role of the fourth measurement. This four-dimensional item is neither flat nor round, yet has a particular geometry portrayed by something like the FLRW metric: Friedmann–Lemaître–Robertson–Walker metric – Wikipedia.
We can get some information about the three-dimensional geometry of some time cut of the Universe, nevertheless. For instance, consider the arrangement of all dots in spacetime for which the Big Bang occurred, suppose, precisely 13.6 billion years prior. What’s the geometry of this arrangement of dots?
All things considered, in standard cosmology, there are essentially three potential outcomes (aside from small scale local deviations caused by the gravity of little objects like galaxy clusters). A period cut of the Universe can be round (positive curvature), flat (zero curvature) or hyperbolic (negative curvature).
as far as our perceptions can tell, time cuts of the Universe are flat, or about so. Obviously, we can’t measure the curvature precisely, we can just measure it from perceptions. Along these lines, we can’t totally decide out that the Universe may in truth be spherical or hyperbolic. Nonetheless, if it is, the size of the curvature must be a lot bigger than the skyline width (or else we would have observed the bend), so the perceptible side of the Universe is almost flat.